horuhk.bramborak.ru

People Skype webchat sexy frauen

Whilst there is no evidence to show that it doesn't, there is nothing to say that other factors may speed up or slow down decay over extended periods.

Carbon dating is not flawed is ashley olsen still dating justin bartha

Rated 4.54/5 based on 528 customer reviews
who is lucy liu dating now Add to favorites

Online today

The results can be as much as 150 million years different from each other! They then pick the date they like best, based upon their preconceived notion of how old their theory says the fossil should be .

So they start with the assumption that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago, then manipulate the results until they agree with their conclusion. So why is it that if the date doesn't fit the theory, they change the facts?

Many people are under the false impression that carbon dating proves that dinosaurs and other extinct animals lived millions of years ago.

Also, different radiometric dating techniques independently converges with each other and with other dating techniques such as dendrochronology, layers in sediment, growth rings on corals, rhythmic layering of ice in glaciers, magnetostratigraphy, fission tracks and many other methods. There exists different versions, or isotopes of many elements.So if scientists believe that a creature lived millions of years ago, then they would need to date it another way. They assume dinosaurs lived millions of years ago (instead of thousands of years ago like the bible says).They ignore evidence that does not fit their preconceived notion.This serves as strong evidence for the reliability of radiometric dating methods. These isotopes differ in the number of neutrons they have in their nuclei.Those isotopes that are not stable decay into daughter nuclei.Most young earth creationists reject all of these points.